Which of the following is NOT a method for evaluating a trainee's performance in tactics?

The selection of personal opinion surveys as the method that does not belong in the evaluation of a trainee's performance in tactics is accurate because this approach relies on subjective perceptions rather than objective measurement.

Practical tests, scenario-based evaluations, and direct observation are all established methods that provide concrete data on a trainee's skill level, decision-making capabilities, and overall performance in tactical scenarios. Practical tests involve hands-on demonstrations of skills, ensuring that trainees can apply what they have learned in real-life situations. Scenario-based evaluations immerse trainees in realistic tactical situations where they can be assessed on their responses and strategies in context. Direct observation allows instructors to witness a trainee’s actions and decisions firsthand, providing valuable insights into their tactical proficiency.

In contrast, while personal opinion surveys may gather feedback from trainees or others about their experiences, they are inherently subjective and may not accurately reflect the individual’s tactical abilities or readiness. Therefore, using these surveys as a primary method of evaluation does not align with the objective assessment standards typically upheld in tactical training evaluations.